01 / Inside the engagement
Situation
Regional property reports depend on more than fast queries. Duplicate records, geographic boundaries and historical updates can change the numbers a reader sees. The client needed those rules handled consistently as its reporting changed.
Context
- Property records
- Geographic scope
- Historical changes
UTIS contribution
- Duplicate rules
- Source-data checks
- Reviewed reports
Simplified workflow. The case text describes the contribution, delivery stage and evidence.
Explore the full conceptual diagram
02 / Inside the engagement
What UTIS did
- Updated duplicate-record handling to account for both property identity and the geographic scope of a report.
- Extended regional market calculations and compared source records with the final reporting tables.
- Worked through release planning and client QA, including checks after the production release.
- Added the ability to rerun historical calculations for selected geographies, so a targeted correction did not require the same treatment everywhere.
03 / Inside the engagement
Results
- Client QA completed a production review of the reporting changes and reported no issues within the checks performed.
- The reviewed counts matched between source and final reporting tables.
- A later production work item confirmed delivery of selected-geography historical reruns.
Why it matters to you
Reporting earns trust when a team can explain how the number was produced and trace it back to the data. Clear duplicate-record rules, geographic scope and controlled history updates make that explanation possible.
Stack
Evidence basis: client production-review records confirm the reporting checks; a separate completed production work item confirms selected-geography historical reruns. No runtime, savings or migration-duration result is claimed.